(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20221:20-cv-01288California2,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH AND

v. NINTH MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., (Docs. 57 & 61) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 On June 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for ‘T.R.O.’ Temporary Restraining Order Against Defendants,” (Doc. 57), and on July 5, 2022, he filed a “Motion Requesting Tempor[ar]y Retraining Order [T.R.O.]” (Doc. 61). The undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s eighth and ninth motions for a temporary restraining order be denied. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s June 6, 2022, and July 5, 2022, motions represent his eighth and ninth motions for a temporary restraining order. The former concerns the processing of legal mail, and the latter involves access to mental health treatment. As with previous orders, the Court will forego a recitation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.