Thompson

(HC) Tavera-Ugarte v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20222:22-cv-00067California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TAVERA-UGARTE, No. 2:22-cv-0067 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a formal federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By order dated May 19, 2022, petitioner was ordered to file an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 4.) Petitioner was advised that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those thirty days have passed, and petitioner has not submitted an affidavit, paid the filing fee, requested additional time to do so, updated his address, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The court notes that petitioner appears to have been released1 from custody. While petitioner has not updated his address as required by Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.