Gates

(PC) Osborne v. Gates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20221:19-cv-01732California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS OSBORNE, Case No. 1:19-cv-1732 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. (Doc. 20) S. GATES, C. CRYER, D. ROBERTS, Defendants. 16 On June 16, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and granted leave to amend. (Doc. 20 at 2.) Plaintiff was informed that it was his “final opportunity to amend his complaint,” and any third amended complaint was due within 30 days of the date of service, or no later than July 18, 2022. To date, no amended complaint has been filed. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” LR 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets,” and in exercising that power, a court may impose sanctions including dismissal of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.