Fox

(PC) Birrell v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20222:16-cv-01818California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT W. FOX, Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs are state prisoners proceeding pro se and individually. On May 10, 2019, this matter was stayed to permit plaintiffs to find representation. On June 29, 2022, the court ordered that, within 21days, plaintiffs file a status report indicating whether they have obtained counsel and, if not, whether they wish to pursue this matter pro se. Plaintiffs were warned that failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiffs Loughmiller, Preyer and Acevedo have not responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that copies of the court’s June 29, 2022 order sent to these plaintiffs were returned, these plaintiffs was properly served. It is a plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of their current address at all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.