Arnold

(PC) Johnson v. Arnold

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20222:17-cv-00344California6,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL JOHNSON, No. 2:17-cv-0344 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS E. ARNOLD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 41. I. Procedural History The undersigned screened the complaint and found that plaintiff had stated cognizable claims against defendants Win, Baumert, and Keursten. ECF No. 13. The claims against defendants Arnold and Lewis were dismissed with prejudice. ECF No. 18. After the close of discovery, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41), which plaintiff opposes (ECF No. 47). II. Plaintiff’s Allegations The complaint alleges that defendants Win, Baumert, and Kuersten were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs. ECF No. 1 at 3-4. In September 2015,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.