Austin v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY A. AUSTIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00097-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
v. (Doc. 4) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Gregory A. Austin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on January 24, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On June 13, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend within thirty (30) days of service of the Court’s order. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff was expressly warned that if he failed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, then the Court would recommend dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a claim. (Id.) The screening order was re-served by mail on July 7, 2022. On August 1, 2022, in lieu of filing an amended complaint, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s…