(PC) Tolliver v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20222:19-cv-02599California2,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RESHON TOLLIVER, No. 2:19-cv-02599-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Screening Requirement As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court will independently dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.