(SS) Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20221:21-cv-00270California7,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TED CHARLES JACKSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00270-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY APPEAL

v. (ECF Nos. 22, 23) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Ted Charles Jackson (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Plaintiff submits: (1) the ALJ erred in ruling that Plaintiff’s condition does not satisfy the requirements of listing 12.10; and (2) the ALJ’s residual functional capacity finding is unsupported because the ALJ failed to properly weigh the opinion of Dr. Musacco, and improperly disregarded substantial evidence. For the reasons set forth below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.