CDS Business Services, Inc. v. Goldline Brands Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20222:22-cv-00243California320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CDS Business Services, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00243-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Goldline Brands, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 The parties agreed to settle this case on May 13, 2022. See Settlement Agreement, Joint 18 Status Report (SJR), Ex. A, ECF No. 12. The parties did not, as Local Rule 160(a) requires, “immediately file a notice of settlement or resolution” with this court, although they did reference 20 their settlement in a stipulation filed June 2, 2022. ECF No. 9. Defendants have now defaulted on their obligations under the settlement agreement. See JSR § 2, ECF No. 12. As the parties work to modify their agreement, they request that the court continue the initial scheduling conference to May 2023, a month after the April 2023 deadline for compliance with the 24 settlement agreement. /d. § 8; see also ECF No. 11 (proposed order). The court denies the setting of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.