Reynolds

Reynolds v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20222:22-cv-00601California2,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHARITA REYNOLDS; ESTATE OF No. 2:22-cv-00601-JAM-KJN

CHELVIN LEE WEBB, BY AND

THROUGH THE ESTATE’S

ADMINISTRATOR SHARITA

REYNOLDS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND

Plaintiffs, v. MALAK SINGH, AN INDIVIDUAL;

KP LOGISTICS, INC., A

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; JOHN

MILLER, JR.; AND DOES

THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. 19 This matter is before the Court on Sharita Reynolds’ (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand. Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 14. Malak Singh (“Defendant” or “Singh”) filed an opposition, Opp’n, ECF No. 19, to which Plaintiff replied, Reply, ECF No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand and her request for fees and costs incurred.1

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for June 28, 2022. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.