(PS) Hanible v. County of Solano Sheriff's Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIHANA HANIBLE, No. 2:21-cv-1315 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants, 17 Plaintiff Brihana Hanible is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to strike pursuant to Rule 12(f), as well as plaintiff’s motions for recusal and for hearing. (ECF Nos. 23, 30, 33, & 34.) For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint, and plaintiff’s remaining motions are denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on July 26, 2021, by filing a complaint and later paying the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.)…