Robert Miska v. Engineering Automation & Design, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20221:20-cv-01183California3,458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MISKA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01183-AWI-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR

v. APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT ENGINEERING AUTOMATION & (Doc. 36) DESIGN, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Currently pending before the Court is the Joint Motion and Motion for Approval of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Robert Miska and Defendants Smith Seckman Reid, Inc. (“SSR”) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (“Conagra”) filed a. (Doc. 36.) The motion was referred to the undersigned for findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. (Doc. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will recommend the joint motion for approval of settlement be granted. Background On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff initiated this action in Stanislaus Superior Court against Defendants Engineering Automation & Design, Inc. dba EAD Management Services, Inc. (“EAD”), SSR and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.