Shah
(PC) Armenta v. Shah
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20222:22-cv-00415California1,671 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00415-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
v. PAUPERIS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
SHAH, et al., COUNSEL Defendants. ECF Nos. 3, 6, 12, 13, & 14 SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT; OR
18 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A RECOMMENDATION
THAT IT BE DISMISSED
20 ECF No. 1
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
22 Plaintiff Richard Armenta, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. ECF No. 1. For the reasons below, these allegations fail to state a cognizable claim, but I will give plaintiff leave to amend his complaint. If he fails to do so, I…