Diaz

(PC) O'Brien v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20221:21-cv-00856California1,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KORY T. O’BRIEN, Case No. 1:21-cv-0856-JLT-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL, AND DENYING REQUEST

v. TO STAY DISPOSITIVE MOTION

DEADLINE AS MOOT

RITA DIAZ, et al., (ECF Nos. 33, 36) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Kory T. O’Brien is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed July 29, 2022, and Plaintiff’s motion to stay the dispositive motion deadline, filed August 8, 2022. (ECF Nos. 33, 36.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendants R. Diaz and J. Moore for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On November 10, 2021, the Court set the case for settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe and stayed the case for seventy days. (ECF No. 21.) On November 16, 2021, Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.