Robinson

(PC) Stevens v. Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20221:22-cv-00742California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, No. 1:22-cv-00742-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROBINSON, (Doc. No. 5) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Lyralisa Lavena Stevens is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initially filed her complaint commencing this action on June 17, 2022. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 29, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis and instead be directed to pay the required filing fee in full if she wishes to proceed with this action because: (1) she is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.