Brooks
Brooks v. Tapestry, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and on No. 2:21-cv-00156-TLN-JDP behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. 14 TAPESTRY, INC. d/b/a KATE SPADE, a 15 Maryland corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendant. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Valerie Brooks’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike. (ECF No. 8.) Defendant Tapestry, Inc. d/b/a Kate Spade (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is visually impaired and legally blind. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Plaintiff alleges Defendant failed to design, construct, maintain, and operate its website in a manner fully and equally accessible to Plaintiff and other people who are visually impaired. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff filed the operative Complaint on January 26, 2021,…