(PC) Gray v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20221:20-cv-00196California5,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE v. ) AND REVISED PRETRIAL ORDER ) KEN CLARK, et.al., ) (Doc. 51) ) Defendants. ) Deadlines: ) Motions in Limine Filing: Nov. 14, 2022 ) Oppositions to Motions in Limine: Dec. 9, 2022 ) ) Jury Trial: Feb. 13, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., 2-3 days )

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Siefken, Jennings-Sedillo, and Hurtado. Plaintiff claims that despite prior warnings, Siefken and Hurtado failed to protect him from being assaulted by other inmates at Corcoran State Prison and that Jennings-Sedillo used excessive force when she shot him with a 40mm round while he was already on the ground. On April 8, 2022, the Court conducted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.