Saxton

United States v. Saxton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20221:20-cv-01278California2,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01278-AWI-SKO

Petitioner, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND

GRANTING RENEWED MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW

(Doc. 22)

ERNESTINA M. SAXTON, M.D.,

15 Respondent. _____________________________________/

17 On July 26, 2022, Timothy J. Buchanan of McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte & Carruth (“Attorney Buchanan”), attorney for Respondent Ernestina M. Saxton, M.D. (“Saxton”), filed his renewed motion to withdraw. (Doc. 22.) Pursuant to the Court’s order entered July 13, 2022, the Court directed Petitioner United States of America (the “Government”) to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion by August 2, 2022, and Attorney Buchanan to file an optional reply by August 5, 2022. (Doc. 21.) The Government timely filed a statement of non- opposition (Doc. 23), and no reply was filed. The matter is therefore deemed unopposed and shall be submitted on the papers. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.