Granda

Granda v. CALPERS

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20222:21-cv-01256California3,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA GRANDA, an individual; JOSE No. 2:21-cv-01256-MCE-KJN GRANDA, an individual, 12 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’

RETIREMENT SYSTEM; and DOES 1- 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiffs Sara Granda and Jose Granda allege they have been discriminated and/or retaliated against for seeking the medical reimbursement needed to procure skilled nursing services through a policy of health insurance issued by Defendant California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“Defendant” or “CalPERS”). Plaintiffs assert a single cause of action for Violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act , 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131, et seq. (“Title II of the ADA”). /// /// /// CalPERS now moves for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c),1 on grounds that Plaintiffs have not stated a viable claim for violation of Title II. As set forth below, that Motion is DENIED.2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.