Rashid
Gilbert v. Rashid
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01328-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
v. (Doc. No. 27) ABDEL S. RASHID; BASMAH A. RASHID d/b/a BOOST MOBILE a/k/a CORPORATE WELLNESS; PERMICH, INC. d/b/a TAQUIERIA MICHOACAN, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On August 8, 2022, the Court heard argument on Defendant’s motion for a protective order. Tanya Moore appeared for Plaintiff and Roger Bonakdar appeared for Defendants. After considering the parties’ papers and arguments, Defendants’ motion for a protective order is denied. (Doc. Nos. 27, 28, 291).
1 Defendants filed a request for judicial notice in support of their reply. (Doc. No. 30). Defendants request the Court to take judicial notice of Exhibit A--report listing cases filed by Plaintiff that was obtained from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (“PACER”). (See Doc. No. 30-1 ). Federal Rule of Evidence 201 permits a court to take judicial notice of facts that are…