Flynt

Flynt v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20222:16-cv-02831California2,928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH FLYNT, et al., No. 2:16-cv-02831-JAM-JDP Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ROB BONTA, in his official JUDGMENT capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, et al., Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. See Pl.’s Mot. for Summary Judgment (“PMSJ”), ECF No. 86; Def.’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement (“DMSJ”), ECF No. 94. Plaintiffs oppose the Defendants’ cross-motion. See Pl.’s Opp’n, ECF No. 95. Defendants replied. See Def.’s Reply, ECF No. 96. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment.1

1 The matter was heard on June 28, 2022. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.