Villegas

(PC) King v. Villegas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20221:17-cv-00676California490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY LEE KING, Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ALLOWING PARTIES TO

SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS RE:

v. CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 1016(3)

AND FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE

R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ, 410(a)(2)

Defendants. 15 On May 18, 2022, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that this action should be dismissed “because Plaintiff’s claim is barred by the favorable termination rule set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).” (ECF No. 106). On May 31, 2022, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 109). On June 3, 2022, Defendants filed their reply. (ECF No. 110). In their motion, Defendants argue that “Plaintiff’s plea included a stipulation to the factual basis for the charge based on the probable cause statement and reports in discovery.” (ECF No. 106-1, p. 2). Defendants also argue that the facts in the Probable Cause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.