Welch

Welch v. Housing Authority of the County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20222:21-cv-00974California3,340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BETH I. WELCH, No. 2:21-cv-00974-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Beth I. Welch’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 16.) Defendant Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. /// /// /// /// ///

The Housing Authority of the County of Sacramento, La Shelle Dozier, and Marc Ledet are also named as Defendants, but they do not join the opposition. The Court will refer to all Defendants collectively as “Defendants.” I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2 The instant action arises from Defendant’s alleged termination of Plaintiff’s housing assistance payment benefits. (See ECF No. 1.) In 2003,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.