Lampkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TRISHKA LAMPKIN AND ROBERT No. 2:20-cv-01204-JAM-JDP

CORTEZ,

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, M. SPANGER

in his official capacity, and

MATTHEW CORTEZ,

13 Defendants. 14 This matter is before the Court on Defendant County of Sacramento’s motion for summary judgment. See Def.’s Motion for Summary Judgement (“MSJ”), ECF No. 17. Plaintiffs filed an untimely opposition. See Opp’n, ECF No. 18. Under the discretion provided by the Court’s local rules, the Court shall construe Plaintiffs’ “failure to file a timely opposition [...] as a non-opposition to the motion.” E.D. Cal. Local R. 230(c). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.1 /// /// 26 1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for July 26, 2022. Despite the lack of an…