(PC) Rood v. Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20221:19-cv-01517California969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01517-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

v. PROCEDURE 4(M) RON CARVER, PHILIPS, NAPOR 14-DAY DEADLINE

KEOVILAY, SCOTT FRAUENHEIM

15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review of the file. Plaintiff who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on February 21, 2020. (Doc. Nos. 15, 18). The Court determined the FAC stated a claim for a violation of Plaintiff’s Eight Amendment rights for a failure to protect or intervene against Defendants John Doe, Philips, and Jane Doe; a medical deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Philips; and a failure to train claim against STRH Administrator/Warden. Service was directed in accordance with the court’s E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases for the Eastern District of California. (Doc. No. 34). Through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.