Schuyler

(HC) Banks v. Schuyler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20222:21-cv-00843California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARLONZO JACKSON BANKS, No. 2:21-cv-00843 TLN DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, and is proceeding pro se. He filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After he filed his habeas petition, petitioner was transferred to the Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Petitioner filed a Motion to Substitute Respondent in this action. (ECF No. 13.) This motion will be granted. See Rule 2(a), Rules Gov’ing § 2254 Cases; Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, SVSP warden Matthey Atchley is substituted for the prior respondent, Jeff Lynch, the warden of California State Prison. Id. Respondent has also filed a motion for extension of time to file traverse. (ECF No. 17.) Respondent has since filed his traverse. (ECF No. 16.) As the traverse has already been filed, the court will deny respondent’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.