Gastelo

(HC) Barton v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20222:22-cv-00932California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM BARTON, No. 2:22-cv-0932 WBS KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER JOSIE GASTELO, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 1, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On July 20, 2022, petitioner was granted an additional fourteen days to file objections. Fourteen days have passed, and petitioner did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.