(PS) Gastelum v. LL Sacramento LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20222:21-cv-01481California3,293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 2:21-cv-01481-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS BE GRANTED LL SACRAMENTO LP, ECF No. 7 Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION AND

DENYING BOTH PARTIES’ MOTIONS TO

STRIKE

17 ECF Nos. 13, 14, & 17

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS

19 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum, proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendant LL Sacramento LP’s hotel is not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and related state laws. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, arguing that plaintiff lacks standing. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff opposes defendant’s motion and has introduced a declaration in support of his standing. ECF Nos. 10 & 11. I recommend that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted. 26 1 Defendant submitted an untimely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.