Dutta

(PC) Curley v. Dutta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20222:17-cv-00105California5,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN CURLEY, No. 2:17-cv-0105 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

RAJA DUTTA, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 41, 44) and plaintiff’s motions to compel and to amend the complaint (ECF Nos. 45, 50). I. Procedural History On screening, the court found that the complaint stated claims against defendant Dutta for violations of substantive due process related to alleged involuntary injections, but failed to state claims for violations of procedural due process or substantive due process claims related to oral medication. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff was given the choice between proceeding on the complaint as screened or amending the complaint. Id. at 8. Plaintiff elected to proceed on the complaint as 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.