County of Mono v. Liberty Utilities Calpeco Electric, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20222:21-cv-00834California1,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF MONO, a political No. 2:21-cv-00834-TLN-KJN subdivision of the State of California; ANTELOPE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a special ORDER district; TOIYABE INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT, INC., a California Corporation; and BRIDGEPORT INDIAN COLONY, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO

ELECTRIC, LLC); and DOES

THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE,

18 Defendants.

20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs County of Mono, Antelope Valley Fire Protection District, and Toiyabe Indian Health Project’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Sever and Remand. (ECF No. 51.) Defendant Liberty Utilities (“Defendant”) opposed the motion. (ECF No. 53.) Plaintiffs replied. (ECF No. 55.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.

Plaintiff Bridgeport Indian Colony (“Bridgeport”) does not join in the motion. Although the moving Plaintiffs indicate in a footnote that Bridgeport intends to file a separate motion to remand, no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.