Foster

Foster v. Schubert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20221:22-cv-00856California1,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00856-HBK Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINITFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THE ACTION IS NOT

ANNE MARIA SCHUBERT, BARRED AS DUPLICATIVE OR BY RES

JUDICATA

Defendant.

SEPTEMBER 6, 2022 DEADLINE

17 (Doc. No. 1) 18 Plaintiff Martin Lee Foster is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on a Complaint filed on July 11, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2). Because the Court finds the instant Complaint appears to be duplicative of an action Plaintiff previously initiated in the Sacramento Division of this Court, the Court directs Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed as duplicative of case number 2:22-cv-00339-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. 2022).2 24 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302 (E.D. Cal. 2022).

2 It appears this case should have been filed in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.