Amaro
Amaro v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL MARQUEZ AMARO; JAVIER Case No. 1:21-cv-00382-JLT-HBK BARRERA, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS AND ORDER DENYING
v. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC.; and DOES (Doc. 4; Doc. 12) through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 18 Before the Court are (1) Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or 12(f), or in the alternative motion for summary judgment under Rule 56(a), (Doc. 4) as duplicative of the related case Montes v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc., 1:20-cv-01162-JLT-EPG and (2) Bee Sweet’s unopposed motion to consolidate (Doc. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is DENIED, and the motion to consolidate is DENIED as moot. I. BACKGROUND The named Plaintiffs of this action, Rafael Marquez Amaro and Javier Barrera, initiated this…