Moore

(PC) Revis v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20221:19-cv-00034California2,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE L. REVIS, No. 1:19-cv-00034-DAD-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO

v. REOPEN CASE

J. MOORE, et al., (Docs. 48 & 49)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Andre L. Revis is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on January 8, 2019. (Doc. 1.) On January 31, 2019, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. (Doc. 8.) Following initial screening (see Doc. 9), Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on September 25, 2019. (Doc. 12.) In a second screening order issued February 20, 2020, the Court determined that Plaintiff did not state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff was afforded 21 days within which to file a second amended complaint. (Id. at 8.) When more than 21 days passed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.