Joksch

(PC) Elder v. Joksch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20222:16-cv-01925California577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COREY JEROME ELDER, No. 2:16-CV-1925-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOKSCH, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion for counsel. See ECF No. 66. Plaintiff last sought counsel on January 3, 2022. See ECF No. 62. That motion was denied on March 8, 2022. See ECF No. 65. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). A finding of “exceptional circumstances” requires an evaluation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.