Perez

(PC) Sekona v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20221:19-cv-00400California909 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-JLT-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 52.)

R. PEREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

18 I. BACKGROUND Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) This action now proceeds with Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Correctional Officers R. Perez, L. Munoz, C. Sims, and Maldonado, (“Defendants”) for failing to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 43.) On May 19, 2022, Plaintiff filed an objection to the court’s order granting Defendants a 90-day extension of time to file a responsive pleading. (ECF No. 52.) The court construes Plaintiff’s objection as a motion for reconsideration of the order. II. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Rule 60(b) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.