London Wallace v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20221:19-cv-01199California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 LONDON WALLACE, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-1199 AWI SAB

Plaintiff

ORDER DISMISSING WITH

v. PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS MARTINEZ, LOZA, and FELLER CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,

Defendants (Doc. No. 142)

11 12 On July 27, 2022, the parties entered into a settlement agreement of this matter. See Doc. Nos. xxx, 142. Part of the settlement requires the immediate dismissal of the individual officer defendants, which will be followed by a later dismissal of the City of Fresno. See Doc. No. 142. Pursuant to the above described settlement agreement, on August 18, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation under Rule 41(a) for the dismissal with prejudice of the individual defendants (Christopher Martinez, Ricardo Loza, and Patrick Feller). See id. The stipulation is signed by counsel of all parties in this case. See id. Rule 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads:

21 (A) . . . the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.