Devine

(PC) Singh v. Devine

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20221:22-cv-00061California4,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00061-JLT-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

v. RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

SHUBHANGINI DEVINE, COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Defendant. (ECF No. 23)

17 Plaintiff Raghvendra Singh is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed August 15, 2022. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.