(PC) Kulp v. Stanislaus County Sheriff Department
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20221:22-cv-00829California1,531 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTHONY JAMES KULP, Case No. 1:22-cv-00829-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION
STANISLAUS CO. SHERIFF DEPT., et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
COGNIZABLE CLAIM
15 (ECF No. 6)
17 Plaintiff Anthony James Kulp is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed August 15, 2022. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to…