Brunk

(PC) Harris v. Brunk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20221:22-cv-00405California2,293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00405-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING ORDER GRANTING IN

FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION

v. Doc. No. 8. D. BRUNK, HAMPSON, FIGUEROA,

JOHN DOE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g)

Doc. No.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

19 This matter comes before the Court upon re-review of the file. On May 11, 2022 the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 8). After taking judicial notice of its files, the Court notes that Plaintiff has at least three dismissals that constitute a strike and finds the Complaint does not establish that Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception. As a result, the undersigned revokes its May 11, 2022…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.