Sutton

(HC) Johnson v. Sutton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20222:17-cv-00958California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYWAN LEONARD JOHNSON, No. 2:17-cv-0958 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER JOHN SUTTON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 14, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner, and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 45. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.