Wheeler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.P. Parnell, No. 2:21-cv-01182-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. Wheeler, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff J.P. Parnell, who is incarcerated and proceeding without an attorney, moves to 18 rescind or vacate an order by the previously assigned district judge. See Mot. Vacate, ECF No. 38. That previous order adopted the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, 20 dismissed the claims against two defendants, declined to impose a preliminary injunction, and denied reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s decision not to appoint counsel. See F&Rs, ECF No. 24; Order Adopting F&Rs, ECF No. 36. “As long as a district court has jurisdiction over the case, then it possesses the inherent 24 procedural power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to 25 be sufficient.” City of Los Angeles, Harbor Div. v. Santa Monica Baykeeper, 254 F.3d 882,…