Momentum Commercial Funding, LLC v. Project Storm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20222:21-cv-00981California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOMENTUM COMMERCIAL No. 2:21–cv–0981–KJM–KJN PS

FUNDING, LLC,

ORDER Plaintiff, (ECF Nos. 14, 20) v.

PROJECT STORM, LLC; VICTOR D.

CARRANZA, Defendants. 17 On July 19, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 20), which were served on all parties who have appeared and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ///// 27 1 Plaintiff was ordered to serve a copy of the findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.