(PC)Heim

(PC)Heim v. Vovkulin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20222:21-cv-01077California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER HEIM, No. 2:21-cv-1077 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER V. VOVKULIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 22, 2022 and June 14, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF Nos. 11, 14. Plaintiff has not filed objections to either set of findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copies of the findings and recommendations were returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.