Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARYL ANTHONY HICKS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00095-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

RUSSELL, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On June 1, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 7. I notified plaintiff that he could proceed with his viable First and Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Russell, but that his remaining claims were not cognizable. Id. at 3-4. I ordered plaintiff, within thirty days, either to file an amended complaint or to notify the court that he wishes to proceed only with his viable claims. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply…