Chavez

(PC) Muhammad v. Chavez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20222:21-cv-01848California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, Case No. 2:21-cv-01848-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

CHAVEZ, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On May 11, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it failed to state a claim, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7. I subsequently granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, allowing him until August 1, 2022 to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 11. To date, he has not done so. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.