Withrow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN LEE McCULLOM, Case No. 2:21-cv-00378-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

PATRICK WITHROW, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On June 12, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it did not state cognizable claims, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7. I also ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing fee or a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v.…