Redman

(PC) Alvarez v. Redman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20222:21-cv-01932California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLACKIE FLORINCEO ALVAREZ SR., Case No. 2:21-cv-01932-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

GRAY REDMAN, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On May 10, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it failed to state a claim, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. I subsequently granted plaintiff an extension, until July 17, 2022, to file his amended complaint. ECF No. 10. In response, plaintiff has filed objections, but has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.