Baughman

(PC) Holmes v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20222:20-cv-01496California1,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVELL C. HOLMES, No. 2:20-cv-1496 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. Plaintiff alleges defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs when they required him to use stairs despite having a “no stairs” chrono and he fell injuring his knee. Before the court are plaintiff’s February 28, 2022 motion to quash, plaintiff’s April 14, 2022 motion for a protective order, and defendants’ May 24, 2022 motion to take plaintiff’s deposition by remote means. In an order filed July 11, this court gave plaintiff additional time to file any reply briefs to his motions and a response to defendants’ motion. In a document filed July 27, plaintiff states that he wants a protective order and that he does not oppose defendants’ motion to take his deposition by remote means. In addition, plaintiff seeks the appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.