Kaur

Gilbert v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20222:21-cv-02090California2,221 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Plaintiff, No. 2:21-cv-2090 TLN DB v. AJINDER KAUR, individually and dba B- FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BROTHERS MINI MART; SATINDER

SINGH Defendants. 17 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for default judgement against defendants Ajinder Kaur and Satinder Singh. (ECF No. 8.) This motion came on for hearing before the undersigned on April 1, 2022. (ECF No. 9.) Attorney Tanya Moore appeared by video on behalf of plaintiff. No appearance was made by, or on behalf of a defendant. Having considered all written materials submitted with respect to the motion, and after hearing oral argument, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Darren Gilbert initiated this action through counsel on November 10, 2021, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges that plaintiff is “substantially limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.