Watrous
(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20221:21-cv-01482California1,310 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, 1:21-cv-01482-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY
ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT
vs. JUDGE TO THIS CASE
WATROUS, et al., AND
Defendants FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO WITHDRAW CONSENT BE
GRANTED
17 (ECF No. 8.)
OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS
20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Sean J. Richson-Bey, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 5, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On February 22, 2022, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and no other parties have made an appearance. (ECF No. 13.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all proceedings in the case…