Watrous

(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20221:21-cv-01482California1,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, 1:21-cv-01482-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT

vs. JUDGE TO THIS CASE

WATROUS, et al., AND

Defendants FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO WITHDRAW CONSENT BE

GRANTED

17 (ECF No. 8.)

OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS

20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Sean J. Richson-Bey, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 5, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On February 22, 2022, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and no other parties have made an appearance. (ECF No. 13.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all proceedings in the case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.